Home Home

CCAMLR

Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources

  • Home
  • Skip to Content
  • Log in

Search form

  • About CCAMLR
  • Conservation measures
  • Science
  • Fisheries
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Meetings
  • Publications
  • Circulars
  • English
  • Français
  • Русский
  • Español
  • Home
  • Publications
  • CCAMLR Science
  • CCAMLR Science, Volume 11
  • CCAMLR Science, Volume 11 (2004):179–187

Publications

  • Basic Documents
  • Statistical Bulletin
    • Statistical Bulletin - Archive
  • CCAMLR Brochure
  • CCAMLR Science
    • Table of Contents
  • Conservation measures
    • Browse conservation measures
    • Past and present conservation measures
  • Commission reports
  • Scientific Committee reports
  • Fishery Reports
  • Fishery Reports archive
  • Fishing-related documents
  • Manuals
  • Posters and other promotional material
  • Scientific Abstracts
  • Order a publication
Print this page
Increase font size
Decrease font size

CCAMLR Science, Volume 11 (2004):179–187

Journal Volume:
CCAMLR Science, Volume 11
Page Numbers:
179–187
Author(s):
Wienecke, B. and G. Robertson
download attachmentDownload (143.64 KB)

Validation of sink rates of longlines measured using two different methods

Abstract / Description: 

Sink rates of integrated weight longlines (lines with 50 g.m–1 lead integrated into two strands of the ground line – IW-50 lines) were measured during commercial fishing operations using two methods: electronic time depth recorders (TDRs) and pieces of string of known length wrapped around empty plastic bottles (bottle method). Sink rates measured to 2 m with bottles averaged 0.23 ± 0.07 m.s–1 compared to 0.17 ± 0.03 m.s–1 recorded by TDRs. This difference was not statistically significant (t12 = –0.181, P = 0.859). When the target depth was 15 m, sink rates measured using the bottle method (0.20 ± 0.02 m.s–1) were significantly slower than those measured by TDRs (0.24 ± 0.03 m.s–1, t10 = –3.851, P = 0.003). Measuring sink rates to 15 m proved difficult with bottles because they were too far behind the vessel, i.e. out of the observer’s sight, when they reached the target depth. Bottles had a high failure rate (60%) due to string becoming entangled during line setting, or bottles vanishing from sight behind waves or in congregations of seabirds before the target depth was reached. No TDRs were lost during the trial. Bottle tests were most useful, depending on sea state and weather conditions, for measuring sink rates to shallow depths when instant readings were required. TDRs can be used to measure sink rates to depths of more than 2 m down to the seabed. A major advantage of the TDRs is the archival nature of the data collected.

This page was last modified on 19 Nov 2012

Contact us

Email: ccamlr [at] ccamlr [dot] org
Telephone: +61 3 6210 1111
Fax: +61 3 6224 8744
Address: 181 Macquarie Street, Hobart, 7000, Tasmania, Australia
Postal address: PO Box 213, North Hobart 7002, Tasmania, Australia

 

Quick Links

  • Job vacancies
  • Schedule of Conservation Measures in Force 2021/22
  • Statistical Bulletin
  • CCAMLR Brochure

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

  • Log in
  • CCAMLR e-groups
  • Support
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer and Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Intranet
  • Webmail
© Copyright - the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources 2025, All rights reserved.  |  Top of page  |  Site by Eighty Options